Jump to content

knirirr

Members
  • Posts

    28
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by knirirr

  1. Following on from this, I have found that Vox do a very similar amp called the Clubman 60. This has a line out.

    It also lacks or simplifies some of the effects and doesn't have the various emulation (inc. distortion) settings, being designed for a clean tone with (semi-)hollow guitars. It sounds ideal, if I can sell the VX50...

  2. Thanks for the pedal link - I might look into something like that.

    A Roland Blues Cube would be great, but is 3.5x the weight and rather expensive. That DV Mark amp is only 2x the weight, though... Perhaps something to consider in the longer term.
    Micing up the amp might be a possibility as I do actually have a microphone and stand.

    • Like 1
  3. I've got a Vox VX50 GTV(*); this is very small and light and therefore good as a practice amp, but if turned up(**) is capable of being loud enough clean to play at a local jazz jam, which is not bad for a small combo with an 8" speaker. But, it's sometimes difficult to find a good place for it so that everyone can hear clearly and I wonder if it would be worth plugging into the PA as well. But, of course, there's no line out on this amp.
    It does have a headphone and also a USB socket, but I don't know if anything useful could be done with those.

    If I understand https://www.thomann.de/gb/millenium_die_dibox_passiv.htm correctly, could this be used to send the guitar signal to both amp and PA? If so then presumably the signal the PA receives won't have the amp's effects, modelling etc. applied.
    Could the amp perhaps be omitted entirely and some sort of pedal used to connect to the PA (if so, what might suit?). If there's a similarly light/small/loud/clean amp with line out that might be worth getting instead.

     

    (*) https://voxamps.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/VX50GTV_VX15GT_OM_EFGSJ1.pdf

    (**) Power on full 50W, gain on half, volume a little over half, usually does the trick.

  4. On 13/07/2023 at 12:49, Dad3353 said:

     

    I've worn out quite a few copies, and am still using it over half a century later, and still coming across new things in there. For such a low price, what's there to lose..? Give it a go...

     

    I've probably got too many jazz books already but why not order this one as well? I just have, for delivery before the end of the holidays. 

    Already got the turtleneck. 😉

    • Like 1
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1
  5. This was purchased earlier this year and has been little-used; I have a G&L ASAT and find that gets the most playing time.

    The leather strap won't be included but the gig bag will.
    I have a box and could in theory post it but I would prefer to avoid that if possible (it would cost extra, also).

     

     

    tele_1.jpg

    tele_2.jpg

    tele_3.jpg

  6. An event I still remember was a Martin Taylor gig. Probably about 1991 or not long after. So, I was very much a novice with limited exposure to the music.

    What was so astonishing about this gig was that it was simply him playing solo, doing the melody, chords and bassline all by himself. I'd never seen or heard anything like that, and wasn't expecting it either as I'd never heard of him and didn't know anything other than that it would be a jazz guitar gig.

  7. On 07/03/2023 at 16:07, LionAquaLooper said:

    Exactly right.  It's not just isolated to karate or any martial arts.  Any kind of sport/activity that requires dexterity and speed, the more tense your muscles are, the less effective you'll be. 


    Indeed! My fencing students groan at hearing the phrase “slow is smooth and smooth is fast” over and over again, but tense muscles and rushing will never give them good point control and quick ripostes. 
     

    At the moment I’m at the stage of trying to (re-) learn how to change chord shapes, and the method mentioned above (slow, frequent practice, with a metronome) is necessary. 

    • Like 1
  8. 48 minutes ago, Crusoe said:

    The HB TUBE 15 Celestion has built in spring reverb, as does the Laney Cub Super 12(which I believe the HB is based)

     

    Thanks - that Laney looks interesting, though the price appears to be quite a bit higher than the Harley Benton.
    Apparently there's a Vox AC4 available as well, though that lacks reverb.

    • Like 1
  9. On 29/01/2020 at 16:57, knirirr said:

    A long time ago I owned a Marshall Mercury amp which I used for comping in a swing band (playing this guitar). It gave a great clean sound, but needed to be run on full power to be (barely) heard alongside all the horns and after about 90 mins it would heat up and start to distort.
    If my guitar playing ever does take off again then a small valve amplifier of some sort that could handle some clean jazz sounds would be nice, hence looking here to see if anything interesting was mentioned.

     

    To follow on from this comment, I stopped guitar for a while as I had other things to do, but now I'm trying again.

    I'm still wondering about a small valve amp.
    Bugera do a 5w combo which seems to be well received. They also do a 5w head which I could (presumably) plug into my 1x12 Orange bass cab.
    Harley Benton's 15w combo looks interesting, as does their 5w one, though I'd prefer something with reverb built in to avoid faffing with pedals.
    Does anyone have any thoughts or experience with any of these?

  10. Despite thinking that I can't play guitar and should stick to bass, some incoming money (bass sale), appearance of a nice guitar at a reduced price, and the appearance of a good excuse to buy it mean I now have a Telecaster.

     

    Previously, I had the following inconveniences with the right hand when playing guitar:

    Thumb - excellent tone from downstrokes when playing chords (I did this in a jazz big band), but useless for single note soloing.
    Plectrum - adequate for single note soloing and chords, though I don't like the tone and though I can use them they always feel awkward.

    Proper guitar fingerstyle, or anything involving plucking with nails - not happening.

     

    I've been trying the two fingers and floating thumb approach I'd use on a bass guitar and it sort of works, though it's a bit fiddly due to the relatively small strings. Is there any reason I shouldn't work on this? I wonder if it might be worth stickiing with, with switching to the thumb for downstrokes on chords (I'll only be playing jazz).

  11. Some more photos are now available.

    According to https://www.vintageguitarandbass.com/gibson/potentiometer/ the pots were made in 1975 and the guitar in or after 1981.
    Clearly, the guitar parts and the new case are worth something (though the chance of me being willing to sell off parts is zero), but I'm still hoping that someone who can work on this themselves and get it back into good order would be interested in it.

    IMG_4071.jpeg

    IMG_4072.jpeg

    IMG_4073.jpeg

    IMG_4074.jpeg

    IMG_4076.jpeg

    IMG_4077.jpeg

    IMG_4082.jpeg

  12. 50 minutes ago, T-Bay said:

    Strange that there is no evidence of the serial number on the back of the headstock as they are fairly deeply impressed. Even if they used filler you would expect it to sink a little and show witness marks. If I could be sure it was a Gibson I would be interested.

     

    I wondered about that as well, but had no particular desire to start scraping off paint (which does appear to be quite thick) just in case it was still visible beneath.

  13. This guitar is discussed in another thread, where an overview of the work that needs doing on it was given.

    I think I'll stick to basses so this might as well go to someone who will make use of it. 

    More photos are below, which show the new case I got for it as the old one was falling apart.

    Please feel free to ask if you have any questions, though I probably can't provide any more information than what's in the thread. For example, no serial number is visible externally so I don't know the date (a previous owner having repainted it a rather nice colour).

     

     

     

     

    IMG_3905.jpeg

    IMG_3906.jpeg

    IMG_3907.jpeg

    IMG_3908.jpeg

    IMG_3909.jpeg

    IMG_3910.jpeg

    IMG_3911.jpeg

    IMG_3912.jpeg

    IMG_3913.jpeg

    IMG_3914.jpeg

  14. According to the serial number (https://www.squierwiki.com/Serial-Number-Tracking) this was made in 2019. I got it early in 2020 and have barely used it other than for a few minutes' noodling here and there; it turns out that I still find guitar strings a bit too small and fiddly for my liking. 😉
    I had a local tech set it up and put new strings on (flats) after I got it. He thought it a good instrument other than the very dry fretboard, which he oiled. It remains in excellent condition with no marks I'm aware of.
    I don't have any suitable box to post this, I'm afraid.

    IMG_3356.jpeg

    IMG_3357.jpeg

    IMG_3358.jpeg

    IMG_3359.jpeg

    IMG_3360.jpeg

    • Like 1
  15. On 25/02/2020 at 17:19, EdwardMarlowe said:

    Unless you'tre particularly sentimentally attached to it, I'd be looking into what it might be worth as is.

    Apologies for not spotting this comment earlier. Funnily enough I was thinking today that if I were to move it on I might be able to squeeze a double bass into the spot it currently occupies...

    I'm not really sure about value, but I would guess that £250 for the guitar plus £500 for the work would give someone a vintage Gibson at a reasonable price.

    There's certainly a sentimental value attached to it but whether that's worth using up limited storage space is another question.

     

    IMG_20170803_161035.thumb.jpeg.a1b389f1cf970378ecd97dcf438830dd.jpeg

    IMG_0741.jpeg

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...